Originally Posted by R57 relay

She did end it, as far as she is concerned. She ruled in USAPA's favor, but threw a little caveat in there. Heck, she may have wanted to rule in your favor, but in the end she couldn't(?) and definitely didn't.

I remember all the posts from you guys while her hearing were going on. I thought you read too much into her words. It appeared to me that she was thinking out loud and giving the attorneys a chance to change her mind. Also, you did not have all the information. You didn't see the other research she did. You assumed too much, she was not producing a ruling when you heard her.