Originally Posted by
Flamer
Yeah, get rid of AFRC where you get twice the combat capability and effectiveness for a third of the cost of REGAF. You must be ripe for AD senior leadership.
Haha, you obviously don't know me. I've never been, nor have I ever considered AD. Part time/airline guy that has zero aspirations of leadership. I'm content with being a flying major my whole career, although Ltc 3 years prior to bailing wouldn't hurt. Zero in-residence and if I do get a masters, it will not be for the AF. The AD would not like a guy like me...they don't seem interested in a guy that just want to be good at my job (flying), and not deal with all the bs butt snorkeling required to make rank.
Let's take a quick look at the Viper community. There are two stand alone Viper wings in the AFRC. Neither sits alert, in fact Homestead has a Guard unit that has an alert det on their base... Ft Worth has the Tulsa Guard sitting alert in their back yard. I could be wrong, but as far I can tell the last time FT Worth deployed was 2007. We're going on our 3rd deployment since that time (would be 4th but we were pulled out to do an ORI). At a minimum, they could consolidate their jets into one wing, with two squadrons, and get rid of a lot of redundant positions. This isn't meant to bash these units...I just think they could easily be folded in the ANG, and that move could save some $$$.
Since we've talked about the HQ, self licking ice cream cone. With two ARC components with such close mission sets, to provide a ready force to deploy when needed, at a much cheaper cost. Do we really need two separate compenents? Do we really need an ANG A staff and a AFRC A staff? So instead of having one group of people running around justifying their existence, we have two... Think of how much we could save in just getting rid of redundancies in the two components.
I'm not a hater of the reserve, I have lots of bros in various reserve positions, and feel that the ANG/Res bring a wealth of skill/knowledge that is irreplaceable. I'm just looking at the budget concerns and thinking of ways to free up cash. Being that the ANG is a bigger (and I believe tougher to get rid of), we could fold AFRC into the Gaurd and save some serious cash. Sure we can sit and have measuring contest, but at the end of the day, we're flat broke. If we don't fix it some way, we are totally screwed.
Originally Posted by
Moby Dick
Amen. Two true stories from a past life:
1. Lots of fuel dollars remaining in a VC-131H squadron. How did they get spent? Fly the plane out over the Atlantic, dump the fuel, come back and log the hours.
That's downright criminal...someone should got to jail for this!
Originally Posted by
Moby Dick
2. $100K left in the King Air account with 30 days left in the FY. Fighter squadron next door out of fuel with 6 weeks remaining. When I asked if we could transfer that fuel money to them the answer: "No, can't be done because they're funded out of a different pot of money."
This stuff angers me to no end! IT'S ALL ONE FREAKING BUDGET, and we all have the same end goal in mind! This whole "you can't use that because it's a different color (or pot) of money," bs has to end! It makes no freaking sense, and is a horrible way of doing business. We can't get certain clothing issue items for a deployment but the squadron next door, just got all brand new furniture to replace stuff that was neither outdated, nor damaged. Don't even get me started on the flat screens that do nothing but show how much money we made for the CFC!
A squadron mate thought he was helping the AF out by finding a better deal on a hotel. He saved the AF 150 bucks. But since he went through a third party website, finance would not pay it. What mind of sense does that make? He tried to save the AF money and they say F you!