Thread: AOL update
View Single Post
Old 02-23-2013 | 07:19 PM
  #191  
cactiboss
Banned
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,240
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by ackattacker
I think you are wrong.

I've read and searched the Declaratory Judgement thoroughly. Although DFR1 is mentioned as part of the "Background", it is not quoted or referenced in the actual judgement, nor is any evidence presented from it. Only the appeal is quoted.

This is the only reference:



During the original DFR case, the plaintiff (Addington) sought a Summary Judgement as well. Judge Wake denied the request.
Do you understand that the DJ has nothing to do with our dfr claim and the refilling of addington?
Reply