Originally Posted by
cactiboss
Do you understand that the DJ has nothing to do with our dfr claim and the refilling of addington?
Back up a moment. You are the one who just said, and I quote:
it is quoted and evidence from it included in DJ
You are trying to claim that DFR1 is a legal precedent and can be used in future court cases.
Now, either your claim is true or it is not. Which is it? Was DFR "quoted" and "evidence from it included" in the DJ?