Originally Posted by
ackattacker
Back up a moment. You are the one who just said, and I quote:
You are trying to claim that DFR1 is a legal precedent and can be used in future court cases.
Now, either your claim is true or it is not. Which is it? Was DFR "quoted" and "evidence from it included" in the DJ?
Two separate cases, addington is quoted because it wasn't dismissed with prejudice, only ripeness and the facts got a conviction (9th refused to look at facts). The DJ is a suit filed by the company asking what the companies responsibility is, not the unions. The DJ used evidence from addington but Silver reversed herself saying the 9ths ruling precluded her from making a ruling on DJ.