Originally Posted by
Carl Spackler
Hilarious! I underlined the word "idea" in my post just to be sure nobody could miss it. Then you quote my post. And I'm the one with the reading comprehension problem? Too funny. Here's my post again for you to re-read...since you didn't the first time:
Originally Posted by
Carl Spackler 
The far more interesting point is how the usual ALPA defenders (padre2992 being the latest example), quickly jumped to defending the idea of an unlicensed lawyer giving us legal advice. Then he attacked Bar for questioning why ALPA would take such advice.
Carl, let me try one more time. I've highlighted your false statement. Please show me ANY post where I defended the idea of an unlicensed lawyer giving us legal advice. All I did was point out yet another APC allegation from the usual ALPA bashers that turns out to be a lie.
Originally Posted by
Carl Spackler
This is the problem with some of the ALPAoids. The first thought is to defend the empire at all costs, rather than stopping and thinking about the wisdom of the status quo. What would you and padre have said if it came to light that DPA was taking legal advice from an unlicensed lawyer? Would your first thought be to defend that concept?
Carl
And this is the problem with some of the ALPA haters. The first thought is to change the subject, cloud the issue, and let the lie that was previously posted go uncorrected. It says volumes about character.