View Single Post
Old 03-01-2013 | 05:45 AM
  #23  
seattlepilot's Avatar
seattlepilot
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 790
Likes: 0
Default

[QUOTE=Mojito:1362257]
Originally Posted by seattlepilot

Seattle,

Yes, I am a pilot. Bedford doesn't tell me anything. I haven't spoken to him since the pilot meeting before RAH bought Frontier. Not sure what "lies I love". Can you please point out where I defended RAH management? I re-read what I posted and can't find any defense of them. I hope you guys do show them you are unified and that this offer is unacceptable--if it truly is. I don't know because I haven't read it. Good on you if you do. My post had to do with your NCs complete incompetence. Nothing more. I support you to the extent you are realistic in your demands. This nonsense has been going on since well before Frontier was part of RAH and, if you guys vote this final offer down, it will be going on for long after Frontier is no longer owned by RAH. Thank you for your reasonable post.
Mojito,
Then i recommend you read this. Make sure your coworkers read it too.
There are so many dangerous points of this lbfo that is unbelivable.

To name few :
- no cancellation pay until year 4 .
- no min guarantee if you are on reserve
- very bad trip rig
- pilots being responsible of their own cell phone coverage.
- pilots being required to own a computer (finally they figured out how to afford those efbs)
- no pay rates for c300 and airbus airplanes.

The last one hurts you guys the most. Why? The way rah management will handle this its the same way they will handle q400 pay. Since we dont have rates on this equipment , they said they were going to pay us 145 rates, despite the fact that this is a 70 seater. Who is to say they are not going ro come back and say " we want republic to operate c300s with 170 rates.

This is like a chess game, you gotta think about the 3rd next move of your opponent.

Please leave all the emotions behind, please read this. If you have any members thar are in goos standing with ibt (i know we have few), please advise them to vote no on this.

Thanks.
Reply