[QUOTE=Scoop;1368533]
Originally Posted by
DeadHead
Well Said RoadKill!!!
Sailing has little to no credibility as far as I'm concerned. Practically 80% of what he posts is biased and skewed. You are going to have to excuse me for not popping wood when he boasts about RFPs going out for near term wide body orders.
DH,
I agree with most of your post but disagree with what is bolded - Sailing has more credibility than most on here. I don't always agree with him, for instance I think this displacement Bid blows. I was expecting more on the last bid and was told to wait for this bid. Now we are told to wait for the upcoming bids. Wash, rinse, repeat.
I am sick of the "good stuff" tomorrow crap - it has been going on for almost 12 years. For the guys upset how this last TA was sold it is nothing new, in 2003 we were shown Pilots required with the NW/CAL code-share vs Pilots without. Same crap as with this last TA - maybe it will happen someday - but as CCR says "someday never comes."
Sailing does tend to gloss over and belittle some of venting that many of us do on this forum and paints a lot of issues with a Pro DALPA point of view but so what? He has right to an opinion just as we all do - challenge him on the facts if you disagree with him. Sailing appears "factually" correct more often than not, however I believe a lot of us here, especially the FOs, are sick of being told how good we have it. To me this is more of an opinion and even though I disagree, I separate this from credibility, which I think Sailing has plenty of.
Scoop - Just my 2 Cents
Scoop,
Your probably right, that was a little harsh of a statement. Some of Sailings' posts have particularly been annoying to me past few days, but I shouldn't discredit him just because I disagree.
Is apologizing permitted in the "latest and greatest" thread?