Originally Posted by
sqwkvfr
How is making a few accurate observations about the demeanor and nature of the posts of some Frontier pilots considered "defamation?"
Also, how is it possible to "defame" the made-up user name of some anonymous agitator with a clearly demonstrated a lack of credibility?
If you knew even a portion of what you pretend, you'd already understand the the vast majority of legal processes are lawyers arguing that other lawyers are wrong. This happens all of the time.
I agree perhaps 3662 isn't a native RAH pilot, but the information he/she posted was indeed factual. Spin it anyway you'd like. As I stated earlier, you choose the road of least resistance. Attacking who the user may or may not be is much easier than dealing with the substance or in this case facts. I personally don't care if you choose to remain blind.
I do understand that lawyers argue with lawyers. Yes this is how the process works, and again you avoided the facts. All I was doing was paraphrasing one sentence in the 11 page document. And you point out lawyers argue with lawyers(really). Forget substance sqwkvfr, go for the low hanging fruit.
One more time, the point 3662 was trying to understand is why you all let CM lie to you. Please keep pointing out the irrelevant and let the facts pass you by.