Originally Posted by
cactiboss
Again you beasties have it all figured out. The west voted for the mou so we gave up our rights to the Nic. Never mind that the 9th said we had to "ratify" a deal before we can sue. So lets see how you think, we ratify the mou we can't sue, we don't ratify the mou we can't sue. Again the 9th said we had to wait to vote a contract in to sue, now they are going to tell us we can't sue because we voted a contract in? Sounds like you are making the wests case for us, usapa got around the Nic. Our suit is ripe.
PS this suit is a "declaratory judgement " there is an important distinction there that I am sure you don't get.
Beasties? I really wonder about you sometimes. EAP is available.
USAPA put out an alternate solution and you guys voted for it.
I know it's a DJ. Would you like for me to go back and review your predictions about the last DJ, and those of your cohorts? I've got a bunch.
If you are so confident in your position, why do you even waste your time trying to convince us? Why not just skip on off to court and not worry about what I or anyone else thinks?
I really don't care about the suits. I'm just throwing you the ball and you retrieve it every time. I do get frustrated with the warped sense of what has happened with our case that you guys try to present.