Originally Posted by
trashhauler
No Lag, as I'm sure you know that was not my point. How do you know the MEC hasn't discussed the reserve implications and figured that it wasn't an issue? Just because somebody on this board interperts the LOA a certain way doesn't makes it so. Now I'm not saying people shouldn't do that and try to find all the problems in the LOA, but my point is, how do you know the MEC didn't do that already?
You also said you haven't talked to any MEC member about this LOA, so how do you know what was said and talked about? The answer is, you don't, so don't make any assumptions.
Good luck on your ambivalence Lag!
Hence, my previous post. If they looked at these forums (I am sure they do), they should be proactive, research all of the Q's asked, and put out an email explaining the validity, or lack of, each point that is brought up. That would alleviate any concerns that we might have on those subjects and give us conspiracy types, tin foil hat folks, and pessimists a reason to not worry!
And I bet that it would increase the level of unity around here seeing these Q's being answered in such a way. It would also prevent some of the infighting that goes on here.
And, how does anyone know that the Union has or hasnt addressed these points? We dont. Not until these points have been brought to their attention. And I would bet that it has been brought to their attention by the belief I have that they read these forums. Hence, my previous post.