[QUOTE=R57 relay "I will accept the final outcome, will you?"[/QUOTE]

Well now, doesn't that sentiment have a vague ring of familiarity to it? Where might we have heard that before....hmmm.

-The fact is, R57, you and your group have made that statement before, and you lied. Oh, but we should believe you this time because you "pinky promise" or "cross your heart and hope to die, stick a needle in your eye"? LOL.

My, what a bold proclamation of integrity on your part...you will accept the outcome "this time"...LMAO!

No, you will be forced to take the outcome this time.

And we now know, don't we, -that if you "didn't like" and were for some hypothetical reason, not forced to accept the outcome of this arbitration that you...your group...in fact, would not accept it....and so on, ad infinitum and in this case...ad absurdum. It would be like the USeast group playing a single number on roulette, only at their insistence their bet is allowed to "ride" through as many spins of the wheel as it takes until their number comes up...Not a bad way to gamble if you were in Vegas...only...if you insisted on those rules you might find a little more than "passive legal resistance" on the part of "the house"...in the form of a pair of beefy security guards "explaining" how the rules worked as your pathetic, delusional a$$es were kicked out the door....Hopefully a metaphor of what will happen to your group at the hands of a judge with common sense...

Oh, and BTW...nothing personal here, I'm sure you're a great group of individuals. It's just that "collective entity" that has no qualms about integrity...after all, you are not really fighting for yourself in this dishonorable pursuit are you R57? But rather for the good of your fellow Easties...And when your group chooses the path they have, you should realize words like "dishonorable" or "no integrity" or "liars" sort of comes with the territory...