Originally Posted by
Nevets
No it doesn't. That is beside the point tony was arguing. In both cases, it is boiler plate language. The difference being the DOS of each contract.
Uh, sir. I made my point. I wasn't speaking to Tony's post.
Well, I was speaking to Tony's post so when you quote my reply to him, then you inject yourself into our conversation.
Either way, my point is valid. Both sets of language are boiler plate for when they were negotiated. That's the point of pattern bargaining.