Originally Posted by
eaglefly
So are you saying that the ONLY decision a judge can make in a DFR suit where senioirty integration is the issue is to re-order that seniority list as per the plaintiffs claims if they so find for the plaintiff...........or in this instance, order the list as per a previous arbitration award that was never implimented ?
I don't know that answer (and not taking sides), but I question that and I'm not yet convinced that there are other options if the judge so chooses.
In the last dfr the judge ordered the nic. implemented once a single contract was reached. Based on that I assume that is what happens again. I strongly suggest you read our filing, easy to read and fills all the holes in.
P.S. You should read it because we lay out how we will sue the shiite out of the apa if they agree to violate the nicolau knowing they will be our successor union.