View Single Post
Old 03-31-2013 | 10:06 AM
  #21  
hypoxia's Avatar
hypoxia
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 278
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by wrxpilot
I've done both. 121 is SIGNIFICANTLY safer for many reasons. It is very naive and flat out ignorant to say otherwise.
I think it is naive to think a Corporation is going to entrust its "Big Wig CEO's" in an "unsafe" part 91 Corporate Jet! It's a fact that part 121 carriers have outsourced aircraft maintenance to foreign countries some being 3rd world.
Link:
http://businesstravelcoalition.com/c...e_analysis.pdf

My comment was in regards to "Part 91 corporate flying". For those who haven't noticed, the rest of "general aviation" barely has a pulse so yes, you are correct, safety is certainly a concern!

Last edited by hypoxia; 03-31-2013 at 10:26 AM.
Reply