Originally Posted by
hypoxia
The point isn't to get over it but to recognize that Congressional legislation is reactionary with little evidenced based science or research! Look how the 121 Cargo pilots got cut out of the duty rest equation! The upcoming ATP requirement for 121 employment probably is a good thing for existing 121 pilots making them that much more valuable but certainly a thorn in the side for aspiring pilots!
It comes down to money! This should be an example of why PAC contributions to your Union are so crucial in getting lobbyists to look after pilot interests! AOPA has a Political Action Committee as well!
I'm all for the 1500hr rule and ATP. Not because I am already well past the mins but because for a LONG time these were the mins with the regionals. Guys cut their teeth banner towing, flying checks/cargo ect...
Personally, I believe no one with sub 1000hrs should be flying passengers. The exemption of course is the Military guys. MIL pilots are usually top of their class and washout very easily unlike a civilian pilot who can re-take stage checks or check rides multiple times until he/she passes.
If aspiring pilots have the desire and "can do" attitude, this new rule won't be a thorn or a road block. No more 0-hero puppy mills. This is a profession and like every profession there's a looooong learning period.
This new rule is a step in the right direction.