Originally Posted by
Staller
Get you assumptions right. Pierce was trying to get SLI data unrelated to contract prior to starting negating the contract with the company. All necessary data has been exchanged post contract. The really bad thing was Pierce went to the company to get the data instead of asking the UAL MEC for it. "Back Stabber"
As "Ronnie" would say "there you go again!"
BS. The CAL Merger cmte made a request of the company to provide W2 wage data in 2011 (includes pay, employee imputed contributions to health benefits, B plan funding, etc.) to provide a baseline from which accurate comparisons could be extrapolated from. UA gets CAL data, and vice versa. The UA MEC balked and it went to arbitration. Arbitrator ruled last summer that the information was relevant and was to be disseminated.