Originally Posted by
APC225
LCAL leaning so heavily on just one of three merger guidelines is risky I think, but it seems they're saying if the company is anemic and static with less career expectations then it negatively affects longevity and status/category. If the arbitrators significantly compartmentalize the three then LCAL will have only made their point in one area. LUAL's argument seems to cover all three more equally, but as such the strength of argument in each seems more diluted.
Jump ball?
Don't worry! Wait till you hear the pierce closing argument/speech/campaign. It'll give you a warm fuzzy feeling.