Originally Posted by SOTeric

Having access to both forums, I find it interesting that each pilot group generally expresses satisfaction with their respective MECs openers.

I suppose this is a good thing since when one group draws the short straw, they'll be satisfied that " they gave it their best shot".

What's also interesting is the primary focus in both cases are the UAL furloughees.

If I were an arbitrator for a day, hands down UAL presents a more well-rounded case utilizing all considerations outlined in the TPA and ALPA merger policy.

But that's just me.