View Single Post
Old 04-15-2013 | 05:39 AM
  #123  
AxlF16
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 1,512
Likes: 0
From: 787 Captain
Default

Originally Posted by Ottopilot
My question is, "Why did you vote 'yes' on a contract with that paybanding?"
Because your weak dick Mstr Chmn and MEC wouldn't allow any progress on the JCBA until they 'got their way'. An epic temper tantrum that a 3 year old would be proud of.

So here it is in very clear terms:
  • By not agreeing to a compromise, CAL ALPA had the ability to delay the JCBA as long as they wanted.
  • At the macro level, delaying the JCBA had very little negative impact to the CAL pilot group over the near term (2-5 years).
  • CAL ALPA leadership demonstrated they would go so far as to violate the terms of the TPA in order to get extra $$ for the CAL pilots.
  • CAL ALPA leadership, without question, was single target track on SLI and, IMO, would do ANYTHING to place the CAL pilot group in a position of advantage.
  • I don't trust the CAL ALPA leadership. I would bet my life that they would've colluded with management in any way they could to F*CK over the UAL pilots if they believed it would help their SLI argument.
  • The CAL pilot group, although some voiced disgust/displeasure/disagreement with the obvious strategy, were unwilling to put a stop to it. IMO, because they were hoping it WOULD put them in a position of advantage. I won't condemn at the individual pilot level, but IMO the CAL pilot group is complicit in the strategy because they didn't end it.
  • There was only ONE way to put and end to that strategy. Vote Yes.
Hope that's clear enough for you. Be careful swinging double edged swords.
Reply