Originally Posted by
vspeed
Given the past history, it is easy to see. Fair is the key wording in the merger policy. To put a non active, unemployed pilot at a furloughing airline that is in financial trouble ahead of a working pilot at a profitable airline with longer and more rapid career expectation is not fair...regardless of how many larger airframe's due for replacement it was bringing to the table...you can't put career expectation on the size of the hull and our numbers prove that. That is the bottom line and anyone not looking at this with rose colored biased glasses inside the ual propaganda machine can see this very easily.
I am sure the arbitrators will look on APC for your expert testimony on how profitable (zero profit leading into the merger) CAL was so they can disregard your CEOs under oath testimony. Bottom line you were hand to mouth"...you are the one spinning CALs rosey picture! Get a clue!