Originally Posted by
Nevets
More dense than I thought. Inc still has the first right of refusal. These aircraft are not replacing XJT's 145s. BH mentioned on the conference call that 14 145 leases had expired an were extended. Replacement sometime next year. UAL's order for these 30 aircraft included 40 options. UAL's scope allows up to 153 76 seaters starting Jan 1. You honestly believe UAL will stop with 30? Come on, you can't possibly be this dense! Really, was is it about any of this that doesn't make sense to you?
Anyway, the deadline can always be extended.
Name calling doesn't validate the inaccurate and outdated propaganda your MEC is giving you to spread. Now just go ahead and repeat the same crap you've been spewing over and over. I'm sure if you say it enough times someone will believe you.
You are the one who references me in every other post lately. Anyway, I'm not referencing anything they have said ever said to me. Everything I've said about his is public knowledge.
Let me say it one more time for you, just because some other regional is getting these 30 aircraft does not null and void Inc's first right of refusal on replacing XJT's aircraft. Is that so hard to understand?