A lot of "Continental" in that post. Is it valid now that Continental does not exist?
For the purposes of this Section 2.04 , references to Continental shall be deemed to include United.
Why are you guys insisting on looking for things that would be bad for us?
Originally Posted by
Ottopilot
A lot of "Continental" in that post. Is it valid now that Continental does not exist?
THAT is the question Nevets can't answer. He wants to play me off as "dense" and "stupid" because he thinks I haven't researched the same undated document he just posted to cover the fact that he can't answer it. The QUESTION is not if the aforementioned document exists, but rather if it is still valid. My sources tell me it is NOT, and this recent E175 announcement would seem to back that up.
Exhibit 10.1
Execution Version
CAPACITY PURCHASE AGREEMENT
BETWEEN
CONTINENTAL AIRLINES, INC.
AND
EXPRESSJET AIRLINES, INC.
DATED AS OF NOVEMBER 12, 2010
I knew you would move the goal post every time. First it was, give me proof. Then it was, that only says to provide the opportunity to bid. Now it's, it says continental, not united or that its an undated document you supposedly researched. And now you pull the, this undated document is no longer valid because of 30 175s that UAL purchased holdings on. If the document is no longer valid, then how is it we still have a CPA with CAL for the 220+ aircraft currently being operated by XJT? It's the same CPA!
What's next Tony? That Acey is one syllable? Face it, you are wrong. Your ego can handle it.