Originally Posted by
magnus0322
I must say that is all you have as a come back? Nevets provided good information... it is your turn to step up to the plate Cap'n.
Here you go. There is no SEC filing of the amended agreement because SKW Inc. is not required to file anything for a subsidiary. His information is from the purchase and is outdated.
Page 49 of the Skywest Inc 2012 10K breaks down the profit/loss or each subsidiary. They've been required to publish this information by the sec for a while now. But I'm sure you already knew that.
Anyway, page 11 of the se report makes reference to the CAL CPA with the same exact date of the CPA I've been quoting from.
http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/793733/000104746913001174/a2212817z10-k.htm
Sounds like they "Refused"....
That's actually a possibility. We don't know yet. And probably won't know until UAL has allocated all the 76 seaters and they are replacing the 220 expiring aircraft from the CAL CPA. The other 22 145s and 9 135s don't count as they are under the UAL CPA that doesn't have any replacement rights.