Originally Posted by
Sunvox
What's the intent????
Your MEC is arguing that our career expectations should be based on trend lines drawn back to 2000, but if I look at contributing factors to the UAL bankruptcy that's going too far. . .
CAL was born in the '80's from a fight with Lorenzo where the pilots on the "winning" side undercut their brethren at Eastern, and since that time CAL has operated with a contract with lower pay and more "efficient" work rules and NOW you think you should be rewarded for that behaviour by taking my seniority. Well, it's the straw that broke my back. Coaches defense of unlimited 50 seat RJ's is too much. Face the facts and tell me it was all ok in the name of competition and then I'll have some respect for the CAL poster on APC, but don't dare try to tell me that you are where you are because you made a better choice and the pilots at UAL caused the problem. I'm sick and tired of the rewriting of history and ALPA policy, and the trite personal slams that constitute argument on this forum.
Joe,
Are you saying that the LUAL pilot group are part of the problem because they voted to relax scope up to 70 seats?