Originally Posted by
Maxepr1
Funny we read that in two different points of view, didn't you read where your expert doubled the value of the slots? Caught your guy in a lie, shut him up for a bit....Schooled oh yea. in your point of view?....Ineffective don't think so....Whats the matter? Cross ineffective did you say, I think mr Matlock needs his time to think.... Funny you guys are quieter when it's your turn for criticism....
The whole point of yesterday was to refute the whole, UAL was on their way out argument that CAL posed, and they did, quite effectively. Thus goes down the main argument of the CAL MEC. Now, back to ALPA merger policy in arguments today I'm guessing.