Part of the problem is Primary (T-6s) is mostly manned with AMC guys as IPs; and a handful of FAIPS.

So, who do impressionable young students listen to when it comes to career expectations and dreams? The young-pup FAIP who came from the T-38, or the crusty C-17 Major?

In business and politics, it's all about exposure and advertising. There are more guys preaching AMC, and many are buying it. Sadly, I am told by some of my former students (now FAIPs) that part of the problem is the endemic laziness of America. They are told the T-38 track is much harder (it is), and since only 25% will get a fighter, why not go the easy way?

I'm over an inch shorter now than when I was a 2Lt. Fortunately, I don't have back or neck problems, despite 30+ years of yanking and banking, and over 6000 hours in afterburning airplanes. Granted, I was more of a 5.0-6.5 "g" guy than a 7.5-9.0.

I'd still do it again. But I'd probably favor lower-g airframes (Strike Eagle and A-10) on my dream-sheet to keep my back in good shape. That never entered my equation when I was waiting for my assignment.