Originally Posted by
Zoomie
This list is no where close to relative seniority.
For one example, a furloughed pilot has no "relative seniority", thus if this were relative, then UAL would be proposing to staple their own furloughs.
Guess it depends on how you define terms here, which this whole exercise is about.
According to this list, furloughed pilots with no access to current jobs get placed ahead of a few thousand active pilots? If that's UALs definition of reasonable, then I hope we put 30 year fences on this and call it a day.
Who decides which definition is correct? The arbitrator of course.
This is an exercise in futility. This UAL list is a cruel joke...nothing more, nothing less.
I expected this, so I'm not upset.
What I find humorous is that the UAL guys think their list is "reasonable".
And you found the CAL list "reasonable"? Placing 97 hires below 2011 hires?