Originally Posted by
robertcfi
Thank you guys for the information, I am aware of what is going on at RAH.
here is my situation, I live in Kansas city so the possible non commute with rah is appealing but St. Louis is not that far of a commute either and there contract/pay is more appealing.
Also I have heard that upgrade times at tsa could be within 12 months.
Interviewed with eagle and they were hiring for the same thing as tsa (145) but were saying upgrades would take 5-6 years with a couple years on reserse Possible.
I know regionals Suck and that I need jet time so where would be better to get that? TSA or RAH
Nevr believe short upgrade times- The 170 is an easy train and guys are gettin mci out of training. Rah sucks but ive been at 3 regionals and they all have their probs. Yea its a bad contract but even wisco(best contract) is not great. Good luck bro. I M me if you need more info. Ill give you the brutal truth about rah- good and bad.