Thanks, you are not the first to think that.

But as far as your argument being invalid, I do not understand? Do you mean to say labor has been under attack since the Reagan administration is an argument? You and I must have vastly different understandings of the terms argument, attack and labor. Or your definitions of the terms must be so vague as to make your statement nearly meaningless.

For future reference, the parts of my post that you chose to ignore can be considered an argument.