Originally Posted by
Scoop
Is it really at their expense, or is it just the invertible correction after management went bonkers with RJs for years?
In other words - if their growth was at our expense, and now we are recapturing flying that used to be at mainline, is it at their expense?
Scoop
True. That's a major reason I voted no on C2012 as well- we were giving things up for something that was going to happen anyway. Mgmt has recently stated they only plan on having 100 CRJ-200s in the system, which is even less than both required and previously projected.