View Single Post
Old 06-03-2013, 07:50 AM
  #491  
Ottopilot
Gets Weekends Off
 
Ottopilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2006
Position: 737 CA
Posts: 2,575
Default

Originally Posted by Airhoss View Post
Sounds like the 900 is a very nostalgic airplane. It performs like and has about the same flight envelope as an old straight pipe 707or the short wing DC-8-61. Boeing should be proud of themselves for putting a microwave in the cave and reintroducing the performance joys of jet flying crica 1962. As a good friend of mine who is now back in the left seat of the 747-400 after three fun filled years sitting in the right seat of the 737 over at L-CAL describes the 900. The things has no go, and it's got no stop and has ref and V-speeds that are made artificially WAY fast because you need the extra smash to avoid a tail strike on take off and landing.

With well over 3,000 hours of737-200,300 and 500 time I can promise you that those versions of the 737 didn't have these issues. Even the small engine 200, it was a dog on a hot day but it had a pretty good wing.

I realize the 900 is our ride now. But that doesn't mean it's not an over stretched over done little POS. The Bus has it's issues but it doesn't have near the performance issues that the 900 has. Plain and simple the 900 is NOT a 757-200 replacement and it never will be. The 757-200 is one of the nicest flying, best performing airplanes ever built.
The 737 was not designed as a 757 replacement, but it IS replacing them none-the-less. Why? Money. It costs less to operate. Plus, you can actually go out and buy a new one. The company makes the business decisions, I just fly.
Ottopilot is offline