Originally Posted by
cactiboss
Yes she doesn't "get" how the 9th could have ruled the way they did. The 9th said it wouldn't be ripe until bargaining was complete, the bargaining they refer to is between the company and usapa. So the company/usapa bargaining for seniority is complete making the case ripe ( that was her reasoning).
I agree, but I seem to remember that the 9th was talking about a JCBA being complete because that is where the final SLI would reside in our situation, so it really wasn't a JCBA that triggered it, but an implemented SLI. Even if the MOU was a JCBA, it does not integrate OUR listS. And again, they said it couldn't be contingent on anything else. I concede that I may not remember it correctly. If I have time I will try and review the ruling.