That's a fair question. And the answer might be to go even deeper into the violation. As there are no liquidated damages associated with contract violations... an arbitor decides that... what would they have to lose at that point. As someone else pointed out, we are talking about a very small amount of money here.

Look I am not saying that what is going on here is right. It definitely is not. I just see a bunch of guys that are ready with pitchforks and torches, and there is much to be determined as to the value of this transgression. Like most violations that occurred on the south side prior to the merger, this will more than likely be taken care of before the need for everybody to lawyer up.

I'll bow out of this one and watch the show from the sidelines.