Nope. Not much of a priority in life esp since no amount of my analysis will swing the arbitrators. On the CAL boards there are countless posts using quotes from the testimony that showed the UAL side looking utterly foolish just as LAX implies for CAL. So basically we have irritating blowhards just like LAX on our side. It's become increasingly clear to me that just as with pundits, the SLI analysts of the internet should be ignored.