Originally Posted by
CleCapt
To say the Nic1 award is the driver is this SLI is incorrect when you firmly believe that the ALPA merger policy has changed.
You can't base your case on the fact that ALPA merger policy has changed and then try to apply a merged SLI that occurred prior to the change.
That is where I was going.
Nic1 caused ALPA merger policy to change. That is an absolute fact. That is what I meant by saying that Nic1 was the driver that materially affected how furloughed pilots will be treated in this award.
I think we're arguing the same point in a round-a-bout way.
This award will be different than Nic1 - yet the CAL side proposed an even more extreme solution than even Nic1.
Scott