Yes. I'm tired of the drama. Plus I think having heard both sides, and all the data, that very close to relative seniority with minor adjustments for longevity and status and category differences are appropriate.

And to be clear, my prediction is the UAL proposed list. Not something "in-between" the two.

I believe that if the CAL team had seen the UAL proposal first, they wouldn't a have proposed such an extreme list. I think they thought UAL would do something extreme and so this was pre-emptive.

Oh the joys of having to present your case first....