Originally Posted by
Staller
It appears the cal MEC or at least the people of HOUSTON have decided to start posturing for a combined MEC. I'm not sure of the true intent of this post but you can tell that there is an attempt to make UAL MEC the responsible party for the problems the two mec's have had/are having. Make one thing clear - if you look at the background of al the things listed in the post, the UAL MEC actions were in reaction to misguided deeds of the cal MEC and their mc.
Not to point the author out - he's a good guy. But he made some strong claims of losing a 7 years seniority if the UAL SLI proposal is accepted - would any of our cal brothers like to support his claim - APC225, a good neutral and capable, you want to chime in with a true assessment?
7 years from what date?? Since LCAL conveniently decided that the ISL snapshot should be April 2013, I'm guessing his numbers are based on such. I'd like to hear how much he loses from the ACTUAL merger date in 2010. That's a much more relevant number.
PS, the LCAL proposal has me losing 11 years, so I'm not sure why I should feel apologetic?