Originally Posted by
XHooker
Eddie, would you be alright with everyone holding the same percentage on the same equipment post-merger they did pre-merger (less retirements)?
No. That's straight relative seniority, which gives absolutely zero credit for status, class, category, and longevity. You know, the things that actually ARE specifically mentioned in ALPA merger policy.
Also, what date are you suggesting using? LCAL keeps throwing around April 2013, which is a VERY different seniority picture than the 2010 merger date. The company started retiring LUAL 757's since they had LCAL 737's to replace them with. Not much to talk about until and unless we are talking about the 2010 seniority list