Originally Posted by
ChrisJT6
Please understand that your reps were obviously convinced of the longevity argument...to bad Fred left early...all that hard work over 3 years suppressing the facts and data to certify a bogus list. The cat got out! I'm sure Arbs don't mind being deceived.
Exactly. If longevity not a big deal why supply bogus information to the hearing then claim "no one knows".
Also notice that as soon as the arbitrators got their hands on the real mainline longevity data (The written letter to management came from the arbitrators themselves), they said they didn't need the extra hearing days.
Anyone who think longevity is not going to be a major player in this is in for a big surprise.