View Single Post
Old 07-01-2013 | 04:32 PM
  #3386  
Nevets
Banned
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 2,934
Likes: 0
From: EMB 145 CPT
Default

Originally Posted by MoarAlpha
Originally Posted by Nevets
You bring up a very good point that no one has ever mentioned. Everyone has always said that SLI will not make a difference to those hired after purchase announcement. But the fact is that those on the ERJ side hired after the announcement may not want a bunch of people slotted ahead of them on ISL. But hey, XJT was gonna shut down and go completely out of business.
God forbid someone hired before you is senior to you.

What a ****ed up world we live in amIright?!
I'm just pointing out it out because it may affect how people vote on a TA.

Originally Posted by ysslah
Originally Posted by Nevets
You bring up a very good point that no one has ever mentioned. Everyone has always said that SLI will not make a difference to those hired after purchase announcement. But the fact is that those on the ERJ side hired after the announcement may not want a bunch of people slotted ahead of them on ISL. But hey, XJT was gonna shy down and go completely out of business.
I can't quote where it exactly says this, but I was told that both ASA and XJT MEC agreed to have everyone who were hired after the merger announcement to be integrated by DOH. Honestly, if you're hired after the announcement, you knew that was a good possibility. In my opinion, it makes sense. Seniority should be back to straight date of hire again starting some point on the merger timeline, no?
Uh yeah, this was decided over two years ago! Very old news.

Originally Posted by oldcarpilot
Originally Posted by ysslah
I can't quote where it exactly says this, but I was told that both ASA and XJT MEC agreed to have everyone who were hired after the merger announcement to be integrated by DOH. Honestly, if you're hired after the announcement, you knew that was a good possibility. In my opinion, it makes sense. Seniority should be back to straight date of hire again starting some point on the merger timeline, no?
Should go back to your source. They can't even talk about SLI until a single contract is achieved. So no deal in any way has been made.
The source is the JCBA and ISL Protocol Agreement.

Last edited by Nevets; 07-01-2013 at 04:47 PM.