Originally Posted by
iceman49
RW,
Its always "buyer beware," its up to us individual voters to read whats available, consult with others and than make a decision. I don't want to believe that people would vote yes, based solely on the premise that hiring would take place. Every voter has to decide for themselves if the contract meets the expectations that they have, than we have to live with the results.
Exactly. I voted no for C2012. However, there was a lot of that contract I really liked and appreciate now. It was a difficult deal to evaluate on it's merits because of the capacity changes we are seeing now. I think the jury is still out until Spring 2014 to verify the changes in Section 1 really worked as intended. Very good arguments can be made on both sides.
For now, it is what it is. We will have some serious JV issues to debate soon.