Originally Posted by
CALFO
Sorry. That was a typo on my part. I meant to say that the cal 2005 pilot was a senior FO in 2010. Why should he be junior to a 1998 ual pilot that can barely hold reserve in 2010?
The 1998 pilot has far more longevity. More than twice as much.
That's why merger policy was changed.
That's why he will be senior.