Originally Posted by
routemap
Pre-merger compensation not a factor? I believe the policy allows it. If it is an equity and of value present it and hope for the best.
Protocol agreement allows us to use the 2013 list.
Our merger committee knew we would have hiring, retirements, advancements way back in 2010. It was a smart move on their part to allow for this.
So you want to use 2010 pay because it supposedly favors you (though that has been argued in court), but then a 2013 seniority list because it favors you. Got it. I'm sure that will be viewed as fair and reasonable