Originally Posted by
gettinbumped
So you want to use 2010 pay because it supposedly favors you (though that has been argued in court), but then a 2013 seniority list because it favors you. Got it. I'm sure that will be viewed as fair and reasonable
Their total compensation was less. Its their MO. Find the outliers and repeat them over and over. Also ignore LONGEVITY because it doesn't count, but try to claim their hourly pay rates are part of merger policy.
Funny I didn't see those written in there anywhere.