View Single Post
Old 07-21-2013 | 09:40 PM
  #3664  
Nevets
Banned
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 2,934
Likes: 0
From: EMB 145 CPT
Default

Originally Posted by JoeMerchant
Originally Posted by Nevets
No, our MEC wanted our line bidding. Your MEC wanted flight line. The XJT MEC compromised. The ASA MEC took over a year to move off of their position. If the ASA MEC would have compromised a year ago, we would've ended up with the same deal we have now except it would have been a year ago.

But keep telling yourself otherwise if it makes your ego feel better.
.
It has absolutely nothing to do with ego for me...It has to do with reality for me.

Dragging things out has actually benefitted me because I guarantee you our vacation low won't be as good with the new contract. I got another year out of it with the delay.

I do think the delay has caused the eventual TA to be less than it would have been if we had settled earlier with our PBS.

Line bidding is a non-starter, so moving off that position is not "compromising" with the ASA side. The fact is, there won't be a TA without it.
Well, considering that the TA won't be as good as what LXJT has now, then it also benefits us to not have a TA. But it was you lamenting that now we may have a TA after the pinnacle and AA bankruptcy. If it was up to me, you keep vacation low and we keep line bidding.