Originally Posted by
Denny Crane
We need to make it painful to the company to violate scope so they don't do it again.
Unfortunately, the company's impending violation will occur in conjunction with the next Section 6 negotiations.
Now we know why the company agreed to (or perhaps insisted on?) a 3-year contract length.
The pattern is well established:
- the company will throw us a couple of bucks to lower the JV percentage.
- DALPA will sell it hard ("time value of money" or whatever slogan they come up with). 60% will panic and vote "yes."
- A few months later, it will become apparent that in addition to ceding scope, we also ****ed away a significant amount of QOL.
- Rinse, wash, and repeat in a few more years.