View Single Post
Old 07-27-2013 | 05:51 AM
  #136152  
Carl Spackler's Avatar
Carl Spackler
Back on TDY
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 12,487
Likes: 0
From: 747-400 Captain
Default

Originally Posted by Timbo
Here's something I've been thinking about ever since the "Early Contract, Golden Opportunity", you know, the one where Richard traded us 4833 with upcoming record profits, in exchange for the 717's and parking the 50 seat RJ's, ie. all of which was going to happen regardless...

What If...

Richard is going to now trade DALPA the much fabled Wide Body Order, for JVTA and NRT Slot relief?

It'll sound something like this:

Hey guys, Richard says we can't make money flying X, Y and Z...but if we give him Scope Relief (again) he will order 12 more A330's, to fly A, B and C!!

Hoo Ray! It's Win Win! Again!

Seems to me that Richard has never wasted an opportunity to trade the corporate long term plans to DALPA, in exchange for more scope relief.

I mean heck, if they are going to do it anyway, why not tell DALPA the whole deal rests ON THEM capitulating...something, right?

What's the worst that could happen?

Has DALPA ever said NO to...anything Richard threw at them?

So, I expect we will give all the JVTA and NRT slot relief necessary, and as soon as we do, Richard will announce the Wide Body Order.... Just don't be surprised when you find out this big Wide Body Order is really 767ER replacement jets, something they were going to have to do anyway.
I think there needs to be one more thing added to your scenario above. DALPA will claim our language was so weak that the legal experts at ALPA said we had almost no chance of winning the grievance. So at least we got the wide body order in exchange PLUS new iron clad language to prevent this from ever happening again.

Fast forward to DALPA's response when new wide bodies replace existing ones: "Stop being so negative about everything". And DALPA's response to the next violation and iron clad language portrayed as indefensible: Shut up you Carl-loving ALPA-hater.

Carl