Originally Posted by
Carl Spackler
I think there needs to be one more thing added to your scenario above. DALPA will claim our language was so weak that the legal experts at ALPA said we had almost no chance of winning the grievance. So at least we got the wide body order in exchange PLUS new iron clad language to prevent this from ever happening again.
Fast forward to DALPA's response when new wide bodies replace existing ones: "Stop being so negative about everything". And DALPA's response to the next violation and iron clad language portrayed as indefensible: Shut up you Carl-loving ALPA-hater.
Carl
You forgot (fill the in blank for any MEMRAT issue)
Glossy graphs showing how many positions we will grow if we agree vs. if we don't,
Memo's from SD hinting at hiring as soon as we ratify,
ALPA lawyers saying we'll get worse if we turn it down,
Much free beer and pizza,
No pro and con paper,
Rhetoric about trusting our leaders,
and all oppisiton will be met with the usual recycled comebacks about DPA, certain Reps, unity, we could end up like APA, USAPA, the economy, etc, and for it to pass 60/40.....
