Originally Posted by
AxlF16
That's a pretty good one....except you pretty much did that already. The ratio you used was 944 CAL FOs to 1000 UAL FOs. That ratio is based off of FAA augmentation requirements...NOT UAL CBA or even actual staffing requirements. Anything else?
Yes, yes there is something else. We even ignored our augmented staffing of our 737. Ha, there you go. I'm sure you can now admit that it could have been worse. Right, RIGHT!
Nah, you guys are never happy. Oh well, I was simply answering your question.
Jseld, I never said yours was extreme. In fact it could be workable with some moderate tinkering. I bet that is what they are doing right now.